cannon fodder
27th August 2003, 07:37 PM
27 August 2003
According to the OECD, Australians now work the longest hours in the rich-world. Even more than the Japanese. So we must be earning more than the others, right? Wrong.
In presenting the figures, the Economist says: "The gap in work effort is now the single biggest reason why GDP per head is lower in the European Union than in the United States."
Well, Australians have American working hours and European incomes. When given a choice between working harder or working smarter, it seems we'll choose the former every time.
Those who've worked in Europe or the US have long known that Australia is the land of the pathetic salary, but thought the laid-back lifestyle compensated. The OECD's figures shatter that myth.
Let's compare our performance to that of some other countries. I'll use GDP per capita to measure income, a widely used measure. Before you start objecting that our dollar is low and our price of living cheaper, the figures are Purchasing Power Parity adjusted, which means they take currency fluctuations and cost of living into account.
The raw figures are given in brackets. Amounts are in US$ and taken from the Economist Intelligence Unit.
· Australians work on average 1,890 hours a year for a GDP per capita of $26,560 ($20,350)
· The Americans do 1,850 hours a year for $36,406 ($36,406)
· The Japanese do 1,880 hours a year for $26,857 ($31,408). This is after 14 years of sub-par economic performance
· The British do 1,700 hours a year for $26,207 ($26,002)
· The French do 1,560 hours a year for $26,805 ($24,014)
· The Dutch do 1,330 hours a year for $26,065
To put that last figure into perspective, the Dutch are doing 14 weeks less work than us a year for the same income - 14 weeks!
I never realised things had got as bad as they have.
For all the government's chest-thumping about our economic performance, we're having to work much harder than anyone else just to keep up. And this from a country rich in natural resources, with world-famous tourist attractions and one of the best-educated workforces in the world.
We were the richest people on the planet for large chunks of the twentieth century, but the last 30 years have seen us eroding our way down the league table. If we'd been involved in a major war, political upheaval or natural disaster, I could almost understand, but we have no such excuse.
We work 20% more hours than most Europeans for the same income and slightly more than Americans for only 75% of their income. We are now the poor cousins of the rich world.
It's a pathetic performance and our politicians and business leaders should be ashamed
:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
I can definately relate to the looooooooooooooong hours etc atm........
:twisted:
According to the OECD, Australians now work the longest hours in the rich-world. Even more than the Japanese. So we must be earning more than the others, right? Wrong.
In presenting the figures, the Economist says: "The gap in work effort is now the single biggest reason why GDP per head is lower in the European Union than in the United States."
Well, Australians have American working hours and European incomes. When given a choice between working harder or working smarter, it seems we'll choose the former every time.
Those who've worked in Europe or the US have long known that Australia is the land of the pathetic salary, but thought the laid-back lifestyle compensated. The OECD's figures shatter that myth.
Let's compare our performance to that of some other countries. I'll use GDP per capita to measure income, a widely used measure. Before you start objecting that our dollar is low and our price of living cheaper, the figures are Purchasing Power Parity adjusted, which means they take currency fluctuations and cost of living into account.
The raw figures are given in brackets. Amounts are in US$ and taken from the Economist Intelligence Unit.
· Australians work on average 1,890 hours a year for a GDP per capita of $26,560 ($20,350)
· The Americans do 1,850 hours a year for $36,406 ($36,406)
· The Japanese do 1,880 hours a year for $26,857 ($31,408). This is after 14 years of sub-par economic performance
· The British do 1,700 hours a year for $26,207 ($26,002)
· The French do 1,560 hours a year for $26,805 ($24,014)
· The Dutch do 1,330 hours a year for $26,065
To put that last figure into perspective, the Dutch are doing 14 weeks less work than us a year for the same income - 14 weeks!
I never realised things had got as bad as they have.
For all the government's chest-thumping about our economic performance, we're having to work much harder than anyone else just to keep up. And this from a country rich in natural resources, with world-famous tourist attractions and one of the best-educated workforces in the world.
We were the richest people on the planet for large chunks of the twentieth century, but the last 30 years have seen us eroding our way down the league table. If we'd been involved in a major war, political upheaval or natural disaster, I could almost understand, but we have no such excuse.
We work 20% more hours than most Europeans for the same income and slightly more than Americans for only 75% of their income. We are now the poor cousins of the rich world.
It's a pathetic performance and our politicians and business leaders should be ashamed
:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
I can definately relate to the looooooooooooooong hours etc atm........
:twisted: